“There is exactly as much publicly available evidence for Murray’s claim as there is for Mueller’s.”
Uh, no there isn’t. The only “evidence” is Assange’s claim and the spread of this theory by right-wing media outlets and websites. Mueller’s report, meanwhile, documented in extreme detail how Russian intelligence service units 26165 and 74455 used malware and spear-phising tactics to hack the DNC and Clinton campaign servers and steal documents and emails.
This information is available in the report, which was made available to the public after you published this. So perhaps you should look over that before you claim the public hasn’t seen “a shred of evidence” to substantiate Russia’s involvement.
In fact, the report is right here, and details how Wikileaks received the documents from Guccifer 2.0 four days after Seth Rich died. It also details how Russia sources began leaking the hacked documents until Assange urged them to hand them over to Wikileaks to disseminate.
And I notice you doing your own smear here, alleging that Mueller must have lied in his report because of his connection to the Iraq War and WMD scandal. Interesting…
You haven’t so much as debunked all these rumors as just denied and dismissed them. And it’s clear you’re clinging to your age-old bias of how this has all been a “witch hunt”.
