Wow, I feel like I should have packed a lunch before reading this long, meandering article. I would have avoided it entirely if I'd known your so-called proof was nothing more than a VERY long-winded version of the "watch and the watchmaker" argument!

I especially liked the stops along the way where you irresponsibly borrowed from several great scientific minds to build up to your point. The idea of some hypothetical "spire" on Mars was another lovely and pointless diversion.

Also, I should point out that your math problem isn't an equation. An equation is a formula that indicates how two mathematical expressions are equal. What you've got here is basic math that proves that multiplying numbers by other numbers results in yet more other numbers.

Alas, what was the mysterious proof that lay at tje end of all that? "All things that are must have a maker"? SMH! Not only is that a circular argument of the worst kind, it's antiquated as all hell! And it's so easily defeated by raising the obvious counter-point, "then what created God?"

Once again, you've shoehorn religion onto a mystery that has not and (most likely) will never be resolved in an attempt to rationalize belief. But all you've managed to do is show that belief can't be rationalized because the argument comes down to a leap of faith!

I apologize for the harsh tone, but the claims you make here are dangerous and irresponsible. You're entitled to believe whatever you want. But don't pretend that its somehow provable!